Letter to the editor: When reason fails, try sarcasm

Posted

Isn’t this illegal? How did they let this slip by? The election was rigged. A Democrat was mistakenly placed on the ballot. How did this happen?

Now, the only thing we can do is count the ballots when Trump is ahead and when his lead begins to diminish, stop counting completely. You know, only count the “legal” votes?

Crowds of armed patriots showed up out of nowhere and danced before the fake media to strong-arm the ballot counters to do the right thing. Unfortunately, this plan was not as well thought out as it should have been. Making opposite demands on opposite ends of this nation accomplished little more than expose their hypocrisy and confusion: being just another brick in the wall of this third world, failed nation that we all love.

And the rigging of the debate: clearly revealed by the fact that Trump (who has nothing to hide) was fact checked more than Harris. He was ganged up on simply because he was raised in New York City, where lying is “baked in the cake.” “That’s just Trump being Trump.”

(A $148 million defamation suit against the former Mayor of Gotham Rudy Giuliani being a prime example of New York City’s “cake.”)

What is the purpose of commanding fact checking of someone who is universally acknowledged, acclaimed and celebrated as having the natural traits and talents of a born liar? Wouldn’t our time be better spent on investigating Harris, who is clever enough to hide the fact that she is obviously lying all of the time?

Let’s face it; the cards are stacked against Trump. This biased corrupt “swamp” only prosecutes law breakers and lets everyone else go free.



Why did it take this nation over 200 years to realize that no president can function properly without breaking the law? How did they ever manage in those ancient days when this country was great?”

Take note that we, as mere mortals, suffer from those same moral and legal restrictions that have plagued Trump and mankind since creation.

I hope that the U.S. Supreme Court will stand by this incredibly magnificent doctrine of immunity — with future presidents. According to the more vocal spokesmen on the right, President Harris will have many reasons to revel in this court’s immunity maxim.

I now have so much confidence in the wisdom of the court, that before it’s my time to go, I hope the U.S. Supreme Court will indeed reign supreme in the other world as well as this one. Will I be able to summon them to arbitrate my case at the gates of heaven and/or hell?

 

Dennis Shain

Centralia